🪴 Quartz 3

Search IconIcon to open search

Separable extension

Last updated January 27, 2022

Idea

The idea of roots being “separable” in the sense that there are no repeated roots is important because it tells us we are working with a “simple” polynomial that can generate all other polynomials with this set of roots (see Nullstellensatz).

A separable element $\alpha$ is one whose minimal polynomial is separable. A separable extension is one in which every element is separable.

Definition

Definition. The number $[K:k]s\coloneqq \left|\sum{K/k}^{\bar{k}/k}\right|$ is called the seperable degree of the algebraic extension $K/k$.

Definition. A finite extension $K/k$ is called finite seperable iff $[K:k]_s=[K:k]$.

Definition. An algebraic element $\alpha\in K$ is called seperable iff the extension $k(\alpha)/k$ is finite seperable. An algebraic extension $K/k$ is called seperable iff all $\alpha\in K$ are seperable over $k$.

By (Property 4) a seperable element is one whose minimal polynomial has no repeated roots, hence the roots of its minimal polynomial are “separated” from each other.

Properties

  1. $[L:K]_s[K:k]_s=[L:k]_s$ if all three are finite.
  2. If $K/k$ is a finite extension then $[K:k]_s\leq [K:k]$.
  3. $\alpha$ is separable over $k$ iff $P_\alpha(T)$ has no multiple roots in $\bar{k}$.
  4. If $K/k$ is finite, then the notions of finite separable and separable coincide.
  5. If $\text{char}(k)=0$ then any algebraic extension $K/k$ is separable. If $\text{char}(k)=p$ and $K/k$ is finite then $[K:k]=p^v[K:k]_s$ for some nonnegative integer $v$.
  6. Every finite separable extension $K/k$ is of the form $k(\alpha)$ for some $\alpha\in K$.
  7. If $k$ and $K$ are finite fields then the extension $K/k$ is always separable.
  8. Suppose $K/k$ is a finite separable extension, $M/k$ any extension. Then $$K\otimes_k M\simeq \oplus M_i$$ is an $M$-algebra isomorphism, where $M_i$ are finite extensions of $M$ of the type $M_{P_i}$, $P_i\in M[T]$, $\sum \text{deg }P_i=[K:k]$. The set ${M_i}$ is unique up to permutation.

Proofs

2

If $\alpha$ is separable over $k$, then $[k(\alpha):k]s=[k(\alpha):k]$. But if $P\alpha$ had multiple roots, then the former would be less than the latter, as the repeated root would only determine a single map in $\sum_{k(\alpha)/k}^{\bar{k}/k}$ while accounting for more than one degree in $[k(\alpha):k]$.

Conversely, if $P_\alpha$ has no repeated roots then the number of roots is in bijection with elements in $\sum_{k(\alpha)/k}^{\bar{k}/k}$ hence $[k(\alpha):k]_s=[k(\alpha):k]$.

6

We can suppose $k$ is infinite, for otherwise $K$ is a finite element and this is generated by the generator of its multiplicative group. We will prove the following claim:

Claim. If $K$ is separable over $k$ and is generated by two elements then it is generated over $k$ by one element.

This will imply the proposition because starting with any finite number of generators we can repeatedly apply the claim to obtain a single generator. There can only be finitely many generators because $K/k$ is finite separable (in particular the extension is finite).

We will now prove the claim. Suppose $K=k(\alpha,\beta)$. Let ${\sigma_i}=\sum_{K/k}^{\overline{k}/k}$. Define $$P(T)=\prod_{i\neq j}(\sigma_i(\alpha)+\sigma_i(\beta)T-\sigma_j(\alpha)-\sigma_j(\beta)T).$$ This is nonzero because $i\neq j$, so either $\sigma_i\alpha\neq\sigma_j\alpha$ or $\sigma_i\beta\neq\sigma_j\beta$ (\alpha and $\beta$ generate $K/k$.) Hence there exists $t_0\in k$ such that $P(t_0)\neq 0$. Thus for any two $i\neq j$, we have $\sigma_i(\alpha+\beta t_0)\neq \sigma_j(\alpha+\beta t_0)$. Thus $[k(\alpha+\beta t_0):k]_s\geq [k(\alpha,\beta):k]_s$. Since both are separable, $[k(\alpha+\beta t_0):k]\geq[k(\alpha,\beta):k]$. But certainly the former cannot exceed the latter, so the two extensions are eqal.

Related


Interactive Graph